Legal Opinion

Moore v. Mims

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1923No. 14053Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

An attachment affidavit, in addition to the grounds of the attachment, averred that “ it will be necessary to execute this attachment by service of garnishment upon S. Mims, administrator of the estate *449of W. E. Bishop, deceased, and that said defendants are insolvent." The administrator thereupon signed a writing entitled in the same cause, saying: “I, as administrator [etc.], do hereby consent to the service of garnishment upon me as administrator in the above stated case, waiving any twelve months exemption that may be allowed by law.” The process of garnishment was served upon him…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Gammage v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. McDonald v. Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Stovall & Brother v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Wingate v. GorntoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API