People v. Khan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecution to elicit evidence that the defendant, charged with sexually touching the younger-than-11-year-old victim from 1997 to 2000 while the family lived in Queens, and with one rape of the victim in Queens in November 2004, raped the victim on frequent occasions between 2001 and 2004 while the family lived in Florida. The evidence was properly admitted to demonstrate the defendant’s pattern of escalating sexual conduct toward the victim during the period between the charged crimes, and as relevant background…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. LeesonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. HoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. FelicianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. HerreraColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GopaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.