Legal Opinion

Park v. Park

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 12, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

The issue raised by this appeal is whether the reimbursement provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 apply to personal injury protection benefits (PIP) paid to passengers of a motor bus registered in another state but who are injured in an accident occurring in this State. We hold that where the insurer of the out-of-state motor bus is authorized to do business in New Jersey, PIP payments to passengers injured in New Jersey are mandated by the so-called deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Since the reimbursement statute expressly includes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zupo v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Zupo v. CNA Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coach USA, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Johnson v. Republic Western Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. Schaefer v. Allstate NJ Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Lymon v. Cape Transit Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  5. DRIVE NEW JERSEY INS. v. GisisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API