State v. Woolfarth

BRÜNOT, J.

This case presents the same question which is disposed of adversely to thé contention of appellant’s counsel in the ease of State v. Dupont (La. Sup.) 127 So. 375. The cases are alike except for this slight difference, viz.: In the Dupont Case, the defendant was charged with grand larceny, he pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to eight months in the' parish jail. In the present case, the defendant was charged with grand larceny, he was tried by a jury, found guilty of the larceny of property of the value of $50, and was sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor, for a term, in the…