Walker v. Giuffre
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens
Courts in New Jersey have traditionally adhered to the American Rule as the principle that governs attorneys’ fees. This guiding concept provides that, absent authorization by contract, statute or rule, each party to a litigation is responsible for the fees charged by Ms or her attorney. Fees charged by one’s own attorney, of course, must comply with our Rules of Professional Conduct, see RPC 1.5, and fees awarded by courts, regardless of *128their basis, are governed by principles of reasonableness, see R. 4:42-9; see, e.g., Litton Indus., Inc. v. IMO Indus., Inc., 200 N.J. 372, 386, 982 A.2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Green v. Morgan PropertiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Berry v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Robert Occhifinto v. Olivo Construction Co., LLC (073174)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Grow Co., Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Kaye v. RosefieldeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.