Legal Opinion
In re Patel
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1042Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as denied appellant’s motion for an order directing an investigation into alleged attorney misconduct, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Scott v. Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rigle v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re TruongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Coombs v. Village of CanaseragaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Topolski v. JumbelicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009