Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1951No. 25077PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment entered nunc pro tunc in Cause No. 14,509, correcting a judgment theretofore entered which, according to the court’s finding, contained an erroneous statement as to the punishment assessed by the trial judge upon appellant’s plea of guilty.

The facts concerning the judgment and its entry are set out in our Cause No. 24,874. See Ex Parte Stansbury, 155 Tex. Cr. R. 73; 231 S.W. 2d 431.

There is no statement of facts in this record, in the absence of which we must assume that the court’s findings regarding the entry and rendition of judgment are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Ex Parte StansburyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte HatfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API