Legal Opinion
Broadly v. Meriden Board of Education, No. 27 35 07 (Aug. 18, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 18, 1992No. 27 35 07Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION In a three count revised complaint, two minor school children, Neil Broadly, Timothy Croce ("the plaintiffs"), and their parents bring this action against the Meriden Board of Education, the Waterbury Board of Education, the Connecticut State Board of Education and its commissioner, Gerald Tirozzi, and the Connecticut Association of Boards of Education. The plaintiffs allege that they are "exceptional children" as defined in C.G.S. 10-76a(c)1 and "children requiring special education" as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.