Legal Opinion

State v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 1970No. 288-1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Appellant David M. Sutherland, appeals from a conviction of rape. He contends the denial of his motions for continuance prevented his counsel from having time to adequately prepare for trial, and he was, therefore, denied effective assistance of counsel. State v. Cory, 62 Wn.2d 371, 373, 382 P.2d 1019 (1963); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, 83 S. Ct. 792 (1963).

There are two issues presented on appeal: (1) Whether, in a case where the granting or denying of a continuance, may operate to deprive one of a constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel, the scope of appellate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API