State v. Sutherland
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Appellant David M. Sutherland, appeals from a conviction of rape. He contends the denial of his motions for continuance prevented his counsel from having time to adequately prepare for trial, and he was, therefore, denied effective assistance of counsel. State v. Cory, 62 Wn.2d 371, 373, 382 P.2d 1019 (1963); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, 83 S. Ct. 792 (1963).
There are two issues presented on appeal: (1) Whether, in a case where the granting or denying of a continuance, may operate to deprive one of a constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel, the scope of appellate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.