People v. Bhupsingh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
At the conclusion of the second round of jury selection, the defense counsel exercised peremptory challenges to five male prospective jurors. Arguing that the defense counsel was purposefully excluding males from the jury, the prosecutor raised a reverse-Batson objection (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Kern, 75 NY2d 638, cert denied 498 US 824). The trial court demanded gender-neutral reasons for the defense counsel’s challenges to those jurors.
Regarding his reasons for challenging prospective juror number seven, the only challenge at issue herein, the defense counsel explained…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. PreshaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SampsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. GoldsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.