Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eittreim v. State Beer Permit Board of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1952No. 48056Published

1DissentThompson, C. J.

(dissenting) — Following the sound principle that an ounce of prevention is more valuable than a pound of cure, the courts long ago adopted and have consistently adhered to the rule that the power to revoke a license necessarily implies the power to deny it in the first instance. A search of the majority and specially concurring opinions herein (except for the attempt made-in the concurring opinion of Judge Smith, written after the point was raised by this dissent) - fails to disclose any answer to the pertinent question as to why the rule does not govern the case at bar. In fact, neither…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bankers Union Life Ins. Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Madsen v. Town of OaklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Curtis v. DegoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API