Legal Opinion

Gamache v. Iam National Pension Fund

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 24, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-1131Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MICHAEL GAMACHE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-1131 (APM) ) IAM NATIONAL PENSION FUND, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Gamache brings this action against Defendant IAM National Pension Fund (the “Fund”) under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. Plaintiff alleges that the Fund wrongfully denied him disability pension benefits after an on-the-job injury. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
Communications Workers of America Lyle Wingate v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company American Telephone and Telegraph Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.