Legal Opinion
Michelin North America, Inc. v. Hamby
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 4, 1998No. 2970528PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jimmy Hamby was injured on November 17, 1995, while working as a tread applicator for Michelin North America, Inc. On November 14, 1996, Hamby sued for workers' compensation benefits, alleging that he had been permanently and totally disabled and that he had been continuously disabled from substantial work as a result of the on-the-job injury. Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court made the following findings:
"That [Hamby] was injured by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, in that, on November 17, 1995, while [he was] building a tire, [Hamby's] left foot…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Edwards v. Jesse Stutts, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Bidermann Industries Corp. v. PetersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. HogueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. SnellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. CagleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Dairyman's Supply Co. v. TealCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Drummond Co. v. HigginbothamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.