Legal Opinion

Board of Equalization v. Shelby 39, LLC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 2013No. 1120084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Justice.

The Board of Equalization and Adjustment of Shelby County (“the Board”) appeals from a consent judgment reflecting an agreement between the Board and Shelby 39, LLC (“Shelby 39”). The Board argues that the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over certain matters decided by the consent judgment. We affirm.

The Board inspects, reviews, revises, and fixes the value of all property returned to or listed with the county tax assessor for each year. § 40-3-16, Ala.Code 1975. Shelby 39 is a real-estate developer. In 2009, 39 subdivision-property lots (“the lots”) owned by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Norton v. LiddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Mobile & Gulf R. Co. v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Hanson v. HearnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. State Dept. of Revenue v. GarnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walter F. Scott III v. Alabama Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API