Legal Opinion

Bijou Park Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 28, 1966No. Docket Nos. 5112-64, 5113-64PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Petitioner Bijou 2 acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Bijou 1 and then completely liquidated the latter. Among the assets of Bijou 1 were numerous installment obligations.

Read the full summary

Petitioner Bijou 2 acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Bijou 1 and then completely liquidated the latter. Among the assets of Bijou 1 were numerous installment obligations. Held, the distribution of such installment obligations by Bijou 1 in the course of liquidation did not constitute a taxable disposition under sec. 453(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; held, further, that by reason of sec. 334(b)(3)(C) the liquidation is not covered by sec. 334(b)(2) and the basis of such obligations to Bijou 2 is the same as their basis to Bijou 1.

1Opinion of the Court

Tannenwald, Judge:

Respondent determined deficiencies in income tax for the years and in the amounts as follows:

[[Image here]]

One of the issues has been settled by the parties. The issues remaining for decision are:(1) Did the distribution to Bijou 2 of certain installment obligations in complete liquidation of Bijou 1 constitute a taxable disposition under section 458 (d) ?1(2) Is Bijou 2 entitled to apply section 834(b) (2) in computing its basis in such obligations ?

FINDINGS OP PACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly.

Bijou 1 was organized as a California…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. J. C. Penney Company, Transferee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Estate of Piper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. In the Matter of Chrome Plate, Inc., Bankrupt. Chrome Plate, Inc. v. District Director of Internal Revenue, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Supreme Investment Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Madison Square Garden Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API