Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Black

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1996No. Docket No. 190127Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Hood, P.J., and Murphy and Neff, JJ. Neff, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Stephens v Dixon, 449 Mich 531; 536 NW2d 755 (1995), reversing the prior Court of Appeals decision in Stephens v Dixon, 199 Mich App 73; 500 NW2d 749 (1993). 450 Mich 887 (1995). On remand, we again find error in the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendants pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). The trial court’s ruling was based on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was barred by the three-year period of limitation provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. DixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Stephens v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API