Legal Opinion

Didiuk v. Karpuk

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1932No. 20480. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Didiuk filed a bill in the circuit court of Peoria county to set aside a deed made by him by which he conveyed to Anna Karpuk a half interest in certain lots in the city of Peoria. Anna Karpuk, and Andrew, her husband, filed an answer denying the material allegations of the bill and alleging that Anna had a half interest in the property and praying that the premises be partitioned and that their answer stand as a cross-bill. The cause was referred to a master, who recommended that the bill be dismissed for want of equity and that the premises be partitioned. Objections to the master's…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dahlmann v. GaugenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indiana Broadcasting Corp. v. Star Stations of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Pfaff v. PetrieIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Corzine v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cornue v. Department of Public AidIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cornue v. Department of Public AidIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API