Legal Opinion
Hall-Buck Marine, Inc. v. Dawn Desbrisay and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1998No. 96-70967Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
134 F.3d 377
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
HALL-BUCK MARINE, INC., Petitioner,
v.
Dawn DESBRISAY and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation
Programs, Respondents.
No. 96-70967.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and submitted Nov. 6, 1997.
Decided Jan. 14, 1998.
1
Appeal from the Decision and Order of the Benefits Review Board, No. 95-1277; United States…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. RamboSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Willie D. Goldsmith v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Container Stevedoring Company v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Albert GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In re County Collector of the County of WinnebagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996