Legal Opinion

In Re Deep Vein Thrombosis Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 22, 2004No. 1606PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.

Before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, seeking centralization at this time of the 24 actions listed on the attached Schedule A and pending in three districts as follows: 22 actions in the Northern District of California, and one action each in the Central District of California and the Northern District of Alabama. 1 Movants, who are plaintiffs in one of the Northern District of California actions, seek centralization in that district. -Plaintiff in one other Northern California action joins in the motion and movants represent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
  2. In Re Janus Mutual Funds Investment LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
  3. In Re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montalvo v. Spirit AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Twardowski v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Twardowski v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Montalvo v. Spirit AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Montalvo v. Spirit AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API