Legal Opinion
United States v. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1997No. 96-3176PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Having examined the briefs and the appellate record, this panel determines unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant, James R. Arnold, appeals his conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for possession of a firearm after a conviction punishable by more than a year imprisonment, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); and possession of narcotics, a violation of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Mark A. McKinnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Claudio Lugo, AKA Lugo Mano, Joel Logue-Lugo, Joel Lugo LukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Sidney R. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jason BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Saunders, LorenzoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.