Watson v. Frnka

Miller, Judge.

These appeals stem from Jacqueline Watson’s failed attempts to renew a complaint that she filed against Patricia Frnka, following a car accident in which Watson was injured. In her sole enumeration of error in Case No. A03A1810, Watson contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her first renewed complaint because OCGA § 9-2-61 is unconstitutionally vague. In Case No. A03A1910, Watson contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her second renewed complaint (based on the same facts alleged in Case No. A03A1810), which she filed after the appeal in Case No. A03A1810…