Legal Opinion

Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Mitchell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 9, 2015No. 2140305PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

Section 25-5-77(a), Ala.Code 1975, a part of the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, provides, in pertinent part:

“If the employee is dissatisfied with -the initial treating physician selected by the employer and if further treatment is required, the employee may so advise the employer, and the employee shall be entitled to select a second' physician from a panel or list of four physicians selected by the employer.”

On July 8, 2014, Samuel Mitchell (“the employee”) filed a multicount complaint against MeadWestvaco Corporation (“the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Troutman Sanders, LLPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Tidwell v. TidwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Dees v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Ex Parte Cowabunga, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Williams Power, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zak v. City of Arab (Ex parte Profit Boost Mktg., Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. Dickinson v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Madison Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. v. K.O.D. (Ex parte Madison Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  4. Madison Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. v. K.O.D. (Ex parte Madison Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  5. Scott v. Murray (In re Murray)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API