Bridge v. Lomax
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 234, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1917, No. 2733, affirming report of Workmen’s Compensation Board in the matter of Elizabeth C. M. Bridge v. Joseph Lomax, trading as Joseph Lomax Carpet Mills and London Guarantee & Accident Co., Insurance Carrier. Appeal' from report of Workmen’s Compensation Board. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 234, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1917, No. 2733, affirming report of Workmen’s Compensation Board in the matter of Elizabeth C. M. Bridge v. Joseph Lomax, trading as Joseph Lomax Carpet Mills and London Guarantee & Accident Co., Insurance Carrier. Appeal' from report of Workmen’s Compensation Board. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order affirming the report. cited: Hills v. Blair, 182 Michigan 20.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, P. J.,
The plaintiff, while an employee of the Joseph Lomax Carpet Mills, received injuries which were sufficiently serious to warrant an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board of $25 for expenses, and $5 per week from January 25,1916, and continuing for 125 weeks, payable weekly. Appeals were taken by the defendants to the Court of Common Pleas and after hearing the exceptions were dismissed and the award affirmed.
There is no dispute as to the facts, the only question being the correct interpretation to be given to Article I, Section 104, and Article III, Section 301, of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hill v. Thomas S. Gassner Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Zapos v. DemasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Gallagher v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919