Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Chambers v. Maroney
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 6, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 67-1050PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Relator has filed in this court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It appeared from the petition that all state remedies had been exhausted. On the basis of the petition, a rule was issued to show cause why an evidentiary hearing should not be granted. At the hearing the District Attorney submitted documents required under Local Rule 16(g). Based on the records submitted, the court is of the opinion that the rule should be discharged and the petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Relator was charged in two indictments for armed robbery and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Petition of Joseph Ernst for a Writ of Habeas CorpusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Chambers v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- State v. McMillinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1972