Legal Opinion

Maurice Carroll v. Joseph Savoretti, District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, Florida

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1955No. 15150Published

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

The appeal in this case presents as its primary question the question presented and this day decided in the Lansky and Shandloff cases, Lansky v. Savoretti (Shandloff v. Savoretti), 5 Cir., 220 F.2d 906 whether the Immigration and Naturalization Service has authority, under Section 1225(a), Title 8 U.S.C.A. to issue a subpoena requiring a naturalized citizen to testify at an inquiry, instituted for the purpose of determining whether denaturalization proceedings will be commenced against him under Section 340 of the 1952 Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1451.

For the reasons set down in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Brunner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Jack Lansky v. Joseph Savoretti, District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, Florida, Sylvia Shandloff v. Joseph Savoretti, District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API