Legal Opinion

Julius Restaurant, Inc. v. Lombardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Petitioner-appellant instituted in the Supreme Court a proceeding for a permanent injunction by personal service on respondent of a notice of motion and a verified petition, to which certain exhibits were attached. No action had been begun, no summons and no complaint had been served. Appellant claimed the right to proceed in this manner upon the authority of section 964 of the Penal Law. Alleging that respondent, with intent to deceive the public, had adopted and was using its trade name of “ Julius ” in connection with a restaurant, bar and grill, appellant prayed for an order enjoining…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McHenry v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Seligman v. . FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Colman v. . CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Jones v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. New York World's Fair 1939 Inc. v. World's Fair News, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schoeman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. MacNamara v. DoubledayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Walton Lake Estates, Inc. v. LiaNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API