Legal Opinion
David v. Saul
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-0464Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMIL D., 1 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-464 (GMH) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 2 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jamil D. (“Plaintiff”) brought this action seeking to reverse the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi (“Defendant” or “the Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits and Disability Insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.