Legal Opinion

Gary D Nitzkin v. Robert M Craig

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2018No. 337744Published

1Per curiam

*679 Plaintiff, Gary Nitzkin, appeals by leave granted 1 the circuit court's order affirming the district court's orders granting summary disposition in favor of defendants, Guardian Alarm Company of Michigan and Robert Craig, also known as Law Offices of Robert M. Craig & Associates. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. BASIC FACTS

In October 2015, Nitzkin received a collection letter with the letterhead of the "Law Offices of Robert M. Craig & Associates." The letter indicated that he owed Guardian $25.16, and it stated:

My client, Guardian…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi CollectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Anthony Graziano v. Michael HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Karen Maguire, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API