Legal Opinion

Auckland v. Lawrence

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1903No. 2337Published

Appeal from the County Court of Otero County.

1Opinion of the CourtGrUNTEH, J.

Action to recover damages through overflow of irrigating ditch; trial to jury; verdict for appellee (plaintiff) for $1.00 damages; judgment in accordance with verdict; therefrom this appeal.

A motion has been filed to dismiss the appeal *292-which, we find unnecessary to decide. We confine the opinion to such assigned errors as are discussed by appellants — Bartholomew v. Yankee, 30 Colo. 361, 70 Pac. 415.

Appellants contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. There is substantial evidence to support the judgment; this is a sufficient reason for our declining to disturb it on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brennan Mercantile Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Means v. GotthelfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  3. Bartholomew v. YankeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Gerspach v. BarhyteColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API