Legal Opinion

Smith v. Globe Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1954No. 34909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

As we see it, the claimant contends that her husband was an employee of Gordon Foods, Inc., because his immediate employer, South Georgia Distributing Company, was and is an agent of Gordon Foods, Inc. The question for decision, then, is whether Gordon had or assumed the right of control over the time, manner, and method of the operation of South Georgia Distributing Company. Bibb Mfg. Co. v. Martin, 53 Ga. App. 137, 141 (185 S. E. 137); Scott v. Minor, 55 Ga. App. 714, 716 (191 S. E. 263); Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Wilkes, 77 Ga. App. 764, 766 (49 S. E. 2d 916). Cases involving this question…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Joiner v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Scott v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. MacOn Dairies Inc. v. DuhartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Department of Revenue v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API