Legal Opinion

Price v. Ruggles

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is partition. The plaintiff, Sarah C. Price, owns an undivided one-half interest in the forty acres in suit. Th,e other one half is .owned by her brother William Guy Ruggles, hereinafter referred to as “Guy.” The land was adjudged to be sold and the proceeds distributed to the parties according to their interests as determined by the court. Judgment creditors of Guy claim right to be paid the amount of their judgments out of Guy’s share of the proceeds. Guy claims homestead rights in the land and to be entitled to one half the proceeds, of the sale free from claims of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Cook v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Smith v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Weymouth v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pollock v. PollockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Byers v. RumppeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Gray v. GrayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API