Legal Opinion
Kelly v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 11, 2011No. 7:10-cv-00172PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to strike affirmative de fenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f), or in the alternative, for partial judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (DE # 20). Plaintiffs’ motion has been fully briefed. Also before the court is the parties’ joint request for hearing on the motion (DE # 24). For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion to strike is allowed in part and denied in part. The companion joint motion for hearing is denied.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an action…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Sharon v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Karen Robinson v. Allied Property and Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Chandler v. Forsyth Technical Cmty. Coll.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
- National Presbyterian Church, Inc. v. Guideone Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Miller as Next Friend of E.M. v. House of Boom Ky., LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Karen Robinson v. Allied Property and Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.