Freeman v. Holmgaard
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellants, defendants in the trial court, appeal a judgment domesticating a New Jersey judgment. The only valid point on appeal is whether the defendants had sufficient “minimum-contacts” in the State of New Jersey to justify service of process under the New Jersey “long-arm statute”. We find that such “minimum-contacts” did exist.
The record reveals the following facts. Beginning negotiations for the entry into a contract in Florida were commenced in New Jersey. The subject matter of the contract was the supplying to a New Jersey association of an airplane to transport its members and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carida v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Radigan v. Innisbrook Resort and Golf ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Oliff v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Beckwith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Klee v. ColaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.