Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Holmgaard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1985No. Nos. 83-2189, 83-2284 and 83-2299Published

1Per curiam

The appellants, defendants in the trial court, appeal a judgment domesticating a New Jersey judgment. The only valid point on appeal is whether the defendants had sufficient “minimum-contacts” in the State of New Jersey to justify service of process under the New Jersey “long-arm statute”. We find that such “minimum-contacts” did exist.

The record reveals the following facts. Beginning negotiations for the entry into a contract in Florida were commenced in New Jersey. The subject matter of the contract was the supplying to a New Jersey association of an airplane to transport its members and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carida v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Radigan v. Innisbrook Resort and Golf ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Oliff v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Beckwith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Klee v. ColaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API