Legal Opinion

Riegel v. Public Utilities Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 1931No. 5037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a deeree ’of the Supreme Court of the District dismissing the bill of complaint.

The suit was begun for the purpose of having declared unlawful an order of the Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia authorizing and approving the rules and practice of certain of the utilities companies operating in the District in requiring a small deposit from customers who were not able to establish financial responsibility when .applying for service.

The order is challenged on the ground that the rule is discriminatory and therefore contrary to certain sections of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Vaught v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wood v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bird v. CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Wood v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API