Legal Opinion

Hokanson v. HIGH SCH. DIST. NO. EIGHT (8) OF PIMA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 21, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 2928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHMOND, Chief Judge.

John E. Hokanson appealed in superior court, pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-264, from the findings of fact, determination of issues, and recommendations of a special hearing commission that preceded his dismissal from his teaching position with High School District No. 8 of Pima County. 1 The trial court entered judgment in favor of Hokanson, ordering his reinstatement with back pay, on the ground that his dismissal was in violation of the open meeting law, A.R.S. § 38 — 431 et seq. We disagree.

There was no request for findings of fact or conclusions of law in the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington School District No. 6 v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Town of Paradise Valley v. AckerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. City of Lexington v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McLeod v. ChiltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Cooper v. Arizona Western College District Governing BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Johnson v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 Governing BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Nelson v. Boundary CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API