Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1938No. 1859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

The State of Texas, through the Commissioners’ Court of Gregg County, instituted condemnation proceedings against T. M. Armstrong with the view of appropriating for a public road 6.74 acres of his land lying in front of his residence and situated in the producing part of the East Texas oil field. The litigation took the usual course in condemnation proceedings. The Commissioners recommended payment of damages in the sum of $725. Armstrong filed exceptions to the report of the Commissioners, etc., and when the cause reached the County Court he filed his pleadings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Birdwell v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Field & Co. v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Manowitz v. GaenslenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. THOMAS v. SMITHCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. McGee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burnaman v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Swartzberg v. City of TempleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API