Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ledee v. Kissiah

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1994No. A94A1474Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Presiding Judge

In his sole enumeration of error, appellant pro se contends that the court erred in dismissing his appeal from the grant of partial summary judgment to plaintiff. Although appellant makes a number of factual statements concerning the history of the underlying case, we are at a disadvantage and cannot consider them because so little of the record was designated by his counsel for this appeal. We have only the original complaint and the requests for discovery which accompanied it, the return of service, the order filed January 14 directing defendant to schedule a hearing on plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Investment Corp. v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Bouldin v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. In the Matter of Martin FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API