Legal Opinion

Paolilli v. Aetna Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On September 30, 1989, the appellant was a passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by Carolyn Herrington. The appellant was injured when Herrington’s vehicle was struck by a vehicle owned and operated by Edgar Parson, Jr. The appellant settled her claim against the Parson vehicle for the full $10,000 limit of Parson’s policy with Hanover Insurance Company. Thereafter, the appellant demanded arbitration for underinsured motorist benefits from Herrington’s insurer, Aetna Insurance Company (hereinafter Aetna). Herrington’s policy with Aetna provided underinsured motorist coverage of $100,000…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Zurich Insurance v. WilburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Enser v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Herrington v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Wick v. Encompass InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API