Legal Opinion

United States v. Dewey Brown, Paul Henry Kidd, Movant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1995No. 95-30022PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Background

Paul Henry Kidd (“Kidd”), an attorney representing Dewey Brown in a criminal case, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and fined $5,000 by the district court for challenging, without an appropriate factual basis, the district court’s handling of his client’s trial. 1 Kidd had alleged in alternative motions for a new trial or for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict and the accompanying brief that

[T]he trial court denied the defendant a fair and impartial trial by creating the perception in the mind of the jury that it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chaves v. M/V Medina StarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. In the Matter of Richard A. Thalheim, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. Robert E. NolenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API