Standard Cigar Co. v. Goldsmith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 97, April T., 1914, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 1,087, on bill in equity in case of Standard Cigar Company of Pittsburg v. G. Goldsmith. Bill in equity to enjoin the infringement of a trademark, and for an accounting.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, J.,
specially presiding, found the facts to be as follows:
*34' 1. The plaintiff, a corporation, began in the year 1905, the manufacture and sale of stogies under the name “Dry Slitz”; this name and design was duly entered and registered as a trade-mark by the Patent Office in February, 1910; since that time -it has acquired a large trade, selling in the year 1912, over 16,000,000 stogies.
2. The plaintiff put up these stogies in boxes containing 100, two packages of fifty each; the word “Dry Slitz” in script letters appears on the outside and inside of the cover and on three sides of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Graham v. PlateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Avery & Sons v. Meikle & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Hohenstein v. PerelstineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- United Drug Co. v. KovacsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gibson Distilling Co. v. NetterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916