Legal Opinion

Hook v. McCune

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1898No. Appeal, No. 172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 172, Oct. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, October Term, 1891, No. 451, on case stated. Case stated to determine the marketable title to real estate.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 172, Oct. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, October Term, 1891, No. 451, on case stated. Case stated to determine the marketable title to real estate. The case stated was as follows: On May 15, 1897, Jacob Q. Hook and George Hook, the plaintiffs in this case, sold and agreed to convey by written agreement to the defendant, Eliza L. Me Cune, for the price or sum of §1,075, ali that certain lot or piece of ground situate in the borough of Bellevue, county of Allegheny and state of Pennsylvania, being lot No. 8 in Kendall Park plan of lots,…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

The question presented by the facts set forth in the case stated ” is whether the orphans’ court sale, made more than five years after the death of the intestate, for the payment of his debts, vested in the purchaser at said sale a good and marketable title to the land in question. The learned president of the common pleas held that it did, and judgment was accordingly entered'in favor of the plaintiffs. For reasons given by him, this was so clearly right that further discussion of the question is unnecessary.

The judgment is therefore affirmed on his opinion.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hershberger v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Department of Public Assistance v. Kovacs, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1942
  3. Lithgow v. Taylor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API