Legal Opinion

Traska v. Piekielko

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 5, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is a case to construe an agreement for the sale of real estate taken in connection with a supplemental agreement thereto. The facts are that the complainant entered into an agreement with Samuel Klausner to purchase certain property and paid a deposit of $500. She was unable to consummate the transaction for lack of funds. She asked the defendant to make a loan of $3,000 to her and take a mortgage, but the defendant declined. Then complainant assigned her contract to the defendants, and a final agreement was entered into for the purpose of securing a return to complainant of such sums of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cake v. ShullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API