Legal Opinion

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2026No. 2:16-cv-06516Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 16-6516 : COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. : MEMORANDUM Judge Juan R. Sánchez August 3, 2026 Defendants Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (collectively, “Comcast”) move to compel production of 225 documents Plaintiff Promptu Systems Corporation withheld as protected by the attorney-client privilege. All of the withheld documents relate to the Glenn Patent Group report (the “GPG report”), a report prepared by Promptu’s outside patent prosecution…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API