Manorcare Health Services, Inc. v. Stiehl
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurrence
ALTENBERND, Judge,
Specially concurring.
I concur in this decision because it is consistent with the existing precedent from this district. I have come to the conclusion, however, that it is both bad policy and bad law to allow an arbitrator to make case-specific, non-precedential, confidential decisions about the enforceability of clauses in an arbitration agreement when those clauses limit or eliminate rights specially created by the legislature to protect nursing home residents. Accordingly, I would prefer to follow the approach of the other districts and permit trial courts to make…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gainesville Health Care Center, Inc. v. WestonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Romano Ex Rel. Romano v. Manor Care, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Consolidated Res. Healthcare Fund I, Ltd. v. FenelusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- ALTERRA HEALTHCARE v. Estate of Linton Ex Rel. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.