Legal Opinion

Bowker v. Haight & Freese Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided September 4, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On petition of Vagri H. Simisen for leave to intervene.

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The claim set forth by the petitioner-is in all respects the same as that set forth in the complaint. The bill is brought by Bowker in behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and the suit is prosecuted in Simisen’s behalf, as much asín Bowker’s. Under these circumstances, there seems no good' reason for allowing petitioner to intervene by another attorney. If he pleases, and will agree to bear his ratable proportion of the expenses of litigation, he may be made a co-complainant, appearing by attorney and counsel now representing Bowker. If not, his peti— *795tio…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fielding v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API