Legal Opinion

Chanute Window Glass Co. v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1912No. 17,533PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Neosho district court.

1Per curiam

The district court properly construed the written instruments which state the engagements of the parties. • The defendant desired to develop' the gas resources of his land and the plaintiff loaned him money to do so, agreeing to accept payment in gas. But the defendant agreed to prosecute development work by drilling additional wells whenever the requirements of the plaintiff demanded. The requirements of the plaintiff demanded additional wells, the defendant failed to drill them, gas was not produced and sold according to the contract, and the note ma*549tured under the provisions of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Enright v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Wilkes v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Humes v. HumesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Prescott, Wright, Snider Co. v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API