Legal Opinion
Burr v. Hays
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 31, 1930Published
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
This is a motion pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that the several causes of action stated therein do not allege facts sufficient to constitute causes of action, and in the alternative to strike out several causes of action on the ground that they are improperly united in the complaint. Previous to January 28, 1929, the defendants were the owners of a leasehold to premises No. 21 East Ninth street, New York city, and formed a corporation of which they owned all the stock and to which the leasehold was assigned. The corporation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bogardus v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- France & Canada Steamship Corp. v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Feuerstein v. German Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Sommer v. EhrgottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920