Legal Opinion

Philes v. Hickies

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1888No. Civil No. 225Published

APPEAL from a Judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. W. W. Porter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of the Second judicial district of Arizona in and for the county of Maricopa. The facts of the case are about these: Philes owned four certain mining claims, and a mill-site near them. He and Thomas H. Blair each owned an undivided one-half of another; and he, Blair, and Polhemus each owned an undivided third of another. These mining claims all lay, in a group adjoining each other, in the Cave Creek mining district aforesaid. Plaintiffs conveyed all their interests in these six mining claims to William W. Hickies, one of the defendants in this action,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. ShermanArizona Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API