Legal Opinion

Hill v. Osborne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1883No. Case No. 966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before Hon. J. E. Dillard, special judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

The statement of facts found in the transcript appears to have been filed after the adjournment of the term of court at which the cause was tried, without any- order of court allowing this to be done. Hence we can take no notice of the statement, and must determine the appeal without reference to it. Eoss v. McG-owen, 58 Tex., 603.

Of the errors assigned, we shall consider only the one which brings in review the ruling of the court below sustaining the intervenors’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended answer to their plea of intervention.

The attitude in which the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. McGowenTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Jones' Adm'r v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Tucker v. BrackettTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Jones v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Edinburg Irr. Co. v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Hinzie v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Herring v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API