City of Seattle v. Felt
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered July 20, 1907, confirming an assessment for local improvements, upon overruling objections thereto.
1Per curiam
The city of Seattle by ordinance provided for the widening of Crescent Drive and East Galer streets, in the Interlaken addition to that city, between 20th Avenue North and 22nd Avenue North, at the cost of the property benefited. Crescent Drive and East Galer streets are parallel streets, and between them and extending into them thirty feet is an unplatted tract owned by D. W. and Eunice E. Felt and *324Ovid A. Byers. The improvement of the streets as ordered required the appropriation of these thirty-foot strips. Condemnation proceedings were accordingly begun, which resulted in an award to the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Metropolitan Building Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- In re Boyer AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- In re Third, Fourth & Fifth AvenuesWashington Supreme Court · 1909